l-tryptophan 220mg micardis 20 mg price alternative allo zovirax albenza 200 aricept 10 mg side effects keflex 2505ml anafranil preis tofranil 50 mg efectos secundarios que es cephalexin 500mg zetia 10 mg glycomet 850 mg side effects alternative to evista risperdal consta generika fluoxetine online kaufen erythromycin salbe preis asacol 500 vermox 100 mg preis flomax 350 mg eurax 10 cream how to use fertomid 50 mg maxalt 10 preis hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg side effects mobicontrol alternative tretinoin creme kaufen yasmin le bon 2015 kamagra 100mg oral jelly side effects lanoxin alternatives cytotec 50 mcg endep alternative alternative zu zyvoxid jelly viagra kaufen januvia drug alternatives viagra 100mg price rhinocort aqua 50 lexapro 10 mg anxiety lotensin 20 mg price etodolac 500 mg price prednisolone 10 mg alternative zu trental floxin 200 mg tablet paroxetine preis phexin 250 mg tablet use bupropion preis alternative to flagyl for trichomonas actonel risedronate sodium 150 mg seroquel generika etodolac 500 mg abuse albenza kaufen chloramphenicol 1000x feldene d 20mg aldactone 100mg side effects citalopram 30 mg preis hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg exelon 1 5 mg preis zantac 50 parlodel 10 saw palmetto 450 mg dosage zestoretic 14cpr 20mg 12 5mg eurax 10 cream fertomid tablet 100mg liv 52 alternative fluoxetine 20 mg street value voltaren preisvergleich 120 generika nexium mups 20mg accutane 20 mg fosamax preisvergleich zenegra 100 dosage keflex 500mg 4 times daily herbal alternative to diamox Creepy vs. Donor-Centered - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Creepy vs. Donor-Centered



About a week ago, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Smart Money: Is Your Favorite Charity Spying on You?

The article describes how nonprofits research donors by using wealth screening tools, public records and databases that provide career and education information, stock holdings, charitable giving history, campaign contributions, and home and real estate values. Researchers have been mining this data for years; it’s nothing new. What’s new is how the internet and software tools have made the practice quicker, easier, and more comprehensive.

To those of us in the profession, we understand that this (publically available and legally-obtained) information is just one part of the equation that will help us understand our organization’s best donors and prospects. This information is balanced with a donor’s affinity for our organization and work, their giving history to us, and their connections to our staff and volunteer leaders. Together, this helps development staff focus their efforts, and make the best use of time and money, in order to advance their missions and create positive change for their communities.

Last week I attended the Willamette Valley Development Officers regional conference and heard Portland State University staff describe a program to connect with donors and alumni. Initial phone calls placed by a recent alum help PSU learn about their donors’ interests and experiences and their communication preferences so that staff can best engage with them in the areas they care about. This program is successful in identifying donors who are interested in learning more about PSU, its schools, and future plans, and those who are not – all of which is important information for their development staff. Their program is respectful, responsive, donor-centered – and research-based.

How do we avoid being creepy? By following the ethical standards set by the Association for Fundraising Professionals and the Association of Prospect Researchers for Advancement, and by developing donor confidentiality and prospect research policies for our organizations to ensure that information is used judiciously and respectfully. Also, by not saying creepy things to donors (or anyone for that matter) such as “when I was googling you the other day, I saw that…”

As far as the special treatment we bestow upon those we see as future major donors, a question brought up in the WSJ article in reference to hospitals and medical institutions, that is one each organization must reconcile for itself. Are you donor-centered or creepy? What would your donors say?


Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

Natalie Lamberjack

Natalie Lamberjack CFRE

Senior Consultant

Natalie dials into the needs of her clients by keeping a calm eye on the big picture view of the nonprofit sector.


Leave a Reply