rogaine 5 preis viagra alternative gnc alternative norvasc lithium alternatives in pregnancy actos generic alternative tretinoin creme kaufen vermox 100mg chewable tablets metformin 500mg twice a day amoxicillin 1000mg preis levitra ohne rezept keflex 2505ml kamagra soft tabs 100mg lincocin jarabe 250 adler ortho kaufen alternative for suhagra diamox generika provera alternative alternative allo zovirax keppra 750 xr cozaar 50 mg tablet price depakote 250 mg uses caverta 50 mg side effects orthomol immun günstig kaufen hoodia 2000 tr actoplus met 15 850 famvir 250 mg tablets ersatz für voltaren salbe famvir 500mg tab mevacor 20 mg side effects noroxin 200mg metformin 1000mg tab her betnovate skin cream 20g preis für zovirax motilium 10 fosamax preisvergleich ortho cyclen alternatives abilify preis 98 alternative to bentyl cozaar 50 mg tablet price cipro 500mg tablets alternative à l'atarax topamax 25 mg preis maxalt lyo 10mg revatio 20 mg for erectile dysfunction avodart alternatives prostate hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg side effects cefadroxil 1000 mg flagyl 400 kaufen ersatz diclofenac natures aid celadrin 500mg alternative calendars for mac yasmin le bon 2015 anafranil preis kaufen viagra 69 erfahrung natural alternative to inderal liv 52 alternative lioresal kaufen preis cialis kamagra 100mg für frauen ersatz für voltaren levitra ohne rezept ersatz für ciprofloxacin allegra generic alternative generika trental what is zenegra 100 clomid alternative pct benzac 10 percent generika nexium mups 20mg aspirin kaufen schweiz Creepy vs. Donor-Centered - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Creepy vs. Donor-Centered



About a week ago, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Smart Money: Is Your Favorite Charity Spying on You?

The article describes how nonprofits research donors by using wealth screening tools, public records and databases that provide career and education information, stock holdings, charitable giving history, campaign contributions, and home and real estate values. Researchers have been mining this data for years; it’s nothing new. What’s new is how the internet and software tools have made the practice quicker, easier, and more comprehensive.

To those of us in the profession, we understand that this (publically available and legally-obtained) information is just one part of the equation that will help us understand our organization’s best donors and prospects. This information is balanced with a donor’s affinity for our organization and work, their giving history to us, and their connections to our staff and volunteer leaders. Together, this helps development staff focus their efforts, and make the best use of time and money, in order to advance their missions and create positive change for their communities.

Last week I attended the Willamette Valley Development Officers regional conference and heard Portland State University staff describe a program to connect with donors and alumni. Initial phone calls placed by a recent alum help PSU learn about their donors’ interests and experiences and their communication preferences so that staff can best engage with them in the areas they care about. This program is successful in identifying donors who are interested in learning more about PSU, its schools, and future plans, and those who are not – all of which is important information for their development staff. Their program is respectful, responsive, donor-centered – and research-based.

How do we avoid being creepy? By following the ethical standards set by the Association for Fundraising Professionals and the Association of Prospect Researchers for Advancement, and by developing donor confidentiality and prospect research policies for our organizations to ensure that information is used judiciously and respectfully. Also, by not saying creepy things to donors (or anyone for that matter) such as “when I was googling you the other day, I saw that…”

As far as the special treatment we bestow upon those we see as future major donors, a question brought up in the WSJ article in reference to hospitals and medical institutions, that is one each organization must reconcile for itself. Are you donor-centered or creepy? What would your donors say?


Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

Natalie Lamberjack

Natalie Lamberjack CFRE

Senior Consultant

Natalie dials into the needs of her clients by keeping a calm eye on the big picture view of the nonprofit sector.


Leave a Reply