clonidine kaufen ohne rezept penegra express 50 side effects casodex 50 mg preis lioresal 10 mg prospect preis acai berry thin tamoxifen natural alternatives toprol xl 50mg pyridium 200 mg cost dilantin 50 mg side effects carafate alternatives ciprofloxacin 500 ohne rezept kaufen dulcolax alternativen voltaren gel preis apotheke benadryl alternative non drowsy silagra 50 mg cipla adalat retard preis generika blopress olanzapine 10 mg price natural alternative to inderal propecia generika kaufen ersatz für remeron pulmicort turbohaler preisvergleich lincocin 10 yasmin pille kaufen probolan 50 que es ponstel 250 mg capsules lincocin jarabe 250 what is zenegra 100 alternative motilium anafranil rezeptfrei kaufen alternative prevacid alternative valide a dropbox mobic 20 mg nitrofurantoin 2015 tamoxifen generika zocor 20 mg tablet what is acivir 200 dt for strattera 100 mg side effects femalefil (cialis für frauen) topamax 25 mg preis zantac 50 clomiphene citrate 50 mg x50 cheap alternative to levitra luvox 50 mg tablets energizer ultimate lithium kaufen seroquel alternative drugs casodex 150 mg preis ersatz diclofenac blopress alternativen synthroid recall 2015 caverta 50 mg kopen best alternative bystolic blopress alternativen januvia tabs 100mg crestor preisvergleich citalopram 30 mg preis saw palmetto alternative natural alternative to endep zerit 20 mg imitrex 50 mg tablets saw palmetto wo kaufen tadalis 100mg lopressor xl 50 side effects macbook pro 13 retina preis ventolin 108 mcg sildenafil 20 mg propecia nebenwirkungen bei frauen casodex 50 mg price tinidazole 500mg100ml Creepy vs. Donor-Centered - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Creepy vs. Donor-Centered



About a week ago, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Smart Money: Is Your Favorite Charity Spying on You?

The article describes how nonprofits research donors by using wealth screening tools, public records and databases that provide career and education information, stock holdings, charitable giving history, campaign contributions, and home and real estate values. Researchers have been mining this data for years; it’s nothing new. What’s new is how the internet and software tools have made the practice quicker, easier, and more comprehensive.

To those of us in the profession, we understand that this (publically available and legally-obtained) information is just one part of the equation that will help us understand our organization’s best donors and prospects. This information is balanced with a donor’s affinity for our organization and work, their giving history to us, and their connections to our staff and volunteer leaders. Together, this helps development staff focus their efforts, and make the best use of time and money, in order to advance their missions and create positive change for their communities.

Last week I attended the Willamette Valley Development Officers regional conference and heard Portland State University staff describe a program to connect with donors and alumni. Initial phone calls placed by a recent alum help PSU learn about their donors’ interests and experiences and their communication preferences so that staff can best engage with them in the areas they care about. This program is successful in identifying donors who are interested in learning more about PSU, its schools, and future plans, and those who are not – all of which is important information for their development staff. Their program is respectful, responsive, donor-centered – and research-based.

How do we avoid being creepy? By following the ethical standards set by the Association for Fundraising Professionals and the Association of Prospect Researchers for Advancement, and by developing donor confidentiality and prospect research policies for our organizations to ensure that information is used judiciously and respectfully. Also, by not saying creepy things to donors (or anyone for that matter) such as “when I was googling you the other day, I saw that…”

As far as the special treatment we bestow upon those we see as future major donors, a question brought up in the WSJ article in reference to hospitals and medical institutions, that is one each organization must reconcile for itself. Are you donor-centered or creepy? What would your donors say?


Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

Natalie Lamberjack

Natalie Lamberjack CFRE

Senior Consultant

Natalie dials into the needs of her clients by keeping a calm eye on the big picture view of the nonprofit sector.


Leave a Reply