co lisinopril generika floxin 200 mg tablet roxithromycin 300 mg preis aspirin effect generika tamoxifen alternatives breast cancer alternative to topamax for seizures protonix 20 mg vs 40 mg actonel 500mg methotrexate 10 mg and alcohol probolan 50 que es cialis alternative uses silagra 50 mg cipla retin a micro $50 off ampicillin 250 mg alternative to bentyl penegra express 50 side effects hoodia gordonii apotheke preis 8020 reglan risperdal consta generika nimotop alternative over counter alternative nexium fluoxetine 20 mg street value famvir 750 precio seroflo 250 alternative cyklokapron ohne rezept zantac 500 vytorin 10 40 price keppra 250 mg preis generika viagra rezeptfrei robaxin 1000 mg methotrexate 60 40 20 rule zithromax preisvergleich cytotec 50 mcg diovan amlo fix 3205mg adalat 2015 may calan 3010r manual famvir 250 mg tablets dulcolax preis österreich anafranil preis energizer ultimate lithium kaufen himalaya septilin syrup 200ml mevacor 10 mg norvasc alternative brands alternative calendars for mac brand cialis 20mg natural alternative to sarafem forzest 20 dosage desyrel 50 mg zararları natural alternative zyban dramamine 50 mg dosis liv 52 alternative dilantin 50 mg side effects motilium alternativen dipyridamole 200 mg side effects lioresal 10 mg alternativen zu atacand adalat retard preis allergic to keflex alternative tadalafil 20 mg online ampicillin 1000x stock lioresal kaufen betapace alternatives metformin 500 mg preisvergleich fertomid 100mg side effects effexor ohne rezept kaufen nexium 500mg alphagan preis torsemide 100 mg torsemide 20 mg price abilify preis 98 arimidex 1 mg preis robaxin 750 vs baclofen liv 52 alternative maxalt lingua 10mg kaufen prilosec recall 2015 bentyl 20 mg uso levaquin 750 cost voltaren preisvergleich 120 propecia generika kaufen depo medrol alternative noroxin 200mg pulmicort topinasal ohne rezept tadalis 20mg tablets viagra preisvergleich natural alternative to coreg citalopram alternative names natural alternative to procrit ventolin spray kaufen adalat preis 4 db kamagra gold 100mg himalaya septilin syrup 200ml chloroquine 250mgproguanil 100mg lithium alternatives in pregnancy alternative januvia aspirin 25 mgdipyridamole 200 mg cymbalta 120 probalance 7310 preis ampicillin-t kaufen fertomid 100mg side effects maxalt lingua 10mg kaufen diamox generika minocycline 50 nizoral tabletten ohne rezept günstige alternative propecia unisom 50 mg side effects baclofen 10mg tab maxalt preis nexium mups 20mg 90 stück aspirin plus c kaufen cymbalta alternatives anxiety kamagra 100 suhagra 100 tofranil 50 mg efectos secundarios herbal alternative to diamox retin-a cream alternatives tamoxifen 10mg vs 20mg Creepy vs. Donor-Centered - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Creepy vs. Donor-Centered



About a week ago, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Smart Money: Is Your Favorite Charity Spying on You?

The article describes how nonprofits research donors by using wealth screening tools, public records and databases that provide career and education information, stock holdings, charitable giving history, campaign contributions, and home and real estate values. Researchers have been mining this data for years; it’s nothing new. What’s new is how the internet and software tools have made the practice quicker, easier, and more comprehensive.

To those of us in the profession, we understand that this (publically available and legally-obtained) information is just one part of the equation that will help us understand our organization’s best donors and prospects. This information is balanced with a donor’s affinity for our organization and work, their giving history to us, and their connections to our staff and volunteer leaders. Together, this helps development staff focus their efforts, and make the best use of time and money, in order to advance their missions and create positive change for their communities.

Last week I attended the Willamette Valley Development Officers regional conference and heard Portland State University staff describe a program to connect with donors and alumni. Initial phone calls placed by a recent alum help PSU learn about their donors’ interests and experiences and their communication preferences so that staff can best engage with them in the areas they care about. This program is successful in identifying donors who are interested in learning more about PSU, its schools, and future plans, and those who are not – all of which is important information for their development staff. Their program is respectful, responsive, donor-centered – and research-based.

How do we avoid being creepy? By following the ethical standards set by the Association for Fundraising Professionals and the Association of Prospect Researchers for Advancement, and by developing donor confidentiality and prospect research policies for our organizations to ensure that information is used judiciously and respectfully. Also, by not saying creepy things to donors (or anyone for that matter) such as “when I was googling you the other day, I saw that…”

As far as the special treatment we bestow upon those we see as future major donors, a question brought up in the WSJ article in reference to hospitals and medical institutions, that is one each organization must reconcile for itself. Are you donor-centered or creepy? What would your donors say?


Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

Natalie Lamberjack

Natalie Lamberjack CFRE

Senior Consultant

Natalie dials into the needs of her clients by keeping a calm eye on the big picture view of the nonprofit sector.


Leave a Reply