ciprofloxacin 500 ohne rezept kaufen bentyl 20 mg uses glyset 50 natural alternative to procrit prostaglandin cytotec kaufen kamagra gold 100mg opinie advair 150 coupon motilium 10mg used for plendil er 10 mg kamagra gel für frauen seroflo 250 alternative what is ciplox 500mg used for apcalis kaufen evecare syrup 200ml fluoxetine 10mg tablets cialis alternative uses acai 10 day cleanse diamox tabletten kaufen maxalt preis plendil alternative viagra alternative kamagra flagyl 500 mg oral tablet effexor kaufen ashwagandha 10 uses sildenafil preis kaufen natural alternative to inderal dipyridamole 200 mg side effects adaalat 3rd july 2015 flovent 250 diskus ortho cyclen alternatives serevent dosieraerosol preis neurontin 500 mg alternative januvia over the counter alternative to imitrex vermox 100 mg preis acivir 200 dt used for betapace alternatives ventolin spray kaufen levaquin 750 mg for uti alternative for glycomet imitrex dosage 100mg ginseng bei frauen arava 10 mg tablets information leaflet liv52 ds kaufen alternative zantac diflucan ohne rezept bestellen ampicillin 500mg 4 times a day ranitidine 50 mg drug study pulmicort topinasal ohne rezept levitra ohne rezept depakote 1000 lexapro 10 mg anxiety alternative à l'atarax fosamax preis allopurinol alternative medicine elavil 50 mg for sleep evecare syrup 200ml alternativen zu blopress feldene d 20mg actoplus met 15 850 alternative zu zyvoxid cozaar 100 mg alternative to omnicef fucidine 20 mg preis serophene 50 mg pregnancy bentyl 20 mg tablets flagyl 1000 mg accutane 20 mg viagra super active 20 mg natural alternative lasix periactin 4mg tablets 100 doxycycline alternatives lyme toprol xl 50mg lithium ersatz flomax 10 pump trental 600 kaufen preis zyprexa viadrene plus the herbal viagra alternative nitrofurantoin 2015 seroflo 250 alternative v-k1 lid repair gel kaufen sinemet 10100 vs 25100 herbal alternative to diamox claritin down alternative kamagra chewable 100 mg aricept preisvergleich chloramphenicol kaufen apotheke adaalat 7th may 2015 singulair ersatz indocid 100 finax 50 alternative calendars for mac casodex 150 mg reglan kaufen diclofenac xr 100mg januvia drug alternatives ortholite ersatz anafranil preis generika für avodart baclofen 20 mg get you high septilin syrup 200ml augmentin rezeptfrei kaufen is there an alternative to arimidex side effects of voveran sr 100 alternative valide a dropbox ersatz für celebrex pamelor 10mg preço procardia 10 prasugrel tulasi 50 days centers allopurinol 100 milligrams provera 20 mg tid alternative to doxycycline for lyme disease aspirin effect generika l- tryptophan 250 plus bonusan ventolin salbutamol kaufen Giving Pledge is Not Without Flaw - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Giving Pledge is Not Without Flaw

by

divider

Not a day has gone by in the past few weeks that I haven’t seen something written about the Gates/Buffett Giving Pledge on a philanthropy blog. But with each passing day the commentary surrounding the project seems to be getting more and more critical. Who could have anticipated that the mega-rich pledging their fortunes to philanthropy could have become such a controversial topic?

On the surface, the project appears seamless – a plan that promises to change the face of philanthropy in the coming decades. No one can argue with the fact that a handful of mega-gifts can significantly impact overall giving. Giving USA 2010 showed that individual giving held steady in 2009, but only as a result of five gifts from high-net-worth donors totaling nearly $1.6 billion.  Without those gifts, overall giving by individuals in 2009 would have declined by 1.1 percent.  The problem with the Giving Pledge’s promise to change philanthropy, however, is that much of the money will not be transferred for years, and even then may be dispersed at a very slow rate.

Many of the families that have signed on so far have pledged to transfer their wealth after their death. Ron Rosenbaum of Slate magazine criticizes this practice.  “Show us the money if you want the credit,” he writes. “And show it to us now, before you die, not in some distant future where a lot of poor and diseased people will themselves have died for lack of timely aid.” While the pledging parties certainly have the option to transfer their wealth during their lifetime, it’s likely that in those cases the money will be funneled into charitable family foundations – and many of those foundations are only required to make grants totaling five percent of their assets each year. The argument is that it could take decades before the money finally trickles out to the organizations that need it now.

While I certainly agree with the above criticisms, the problem I see with the pledge is the spotlight it shines on the rare mega-gift, and the attention that it takes away from the everyday donor. While the donations made by the über-wealthy are certainly generous, in many cases they are not stretch gifts. Personally, I am far more moved by middle class families that have remained committed to supporting the organizations in their communities even in the face of their own pay-cuts and job losses.

Don’t get me wrong – overall, I think the Giving Pledge is a great project. But it would be sad to see organizations become fixated on claiming their piece of the mega-gift pie when there are so many mid-level donors that have continued to give, even when it hasn’t been easy.

divider

Like this post? Why not share it?

divider

About the Author

Collins Team

Collins Team

divider

Leave a Reply