glucophage sr 1000 mg ersatz medikament keppra 10 x kamagra oral jelly (mixed flavours) pamelor 10mg para enxaqueca hydrea 500 mg caps 100 probolan 50 que es minipress 10mg sildenafil 20 mg alli alternative uk fertomid 100mg side effects flomax 350 mg celexa 2015 nootropil 1200 pret voltaren 50mg dosage preis crestor crestor 10mg lariam in thailand kaufen fluoxetine 500mg protonix vs zantac 150 homöopathischer ersatz für diclofenac finasteride 5 mg preis roter ginseng preis alternative drug for cytotec aricept 10 mg xalatan preisvergleich levitra ersatz pulmicort ersatz ciprofloxacin 500 ohne rezept kaufen arava 101b azulfidine 500 efexor generika strattera generic alternative dulcolax kaufen diamox generika brahmi 450 natural alternative to fosamax hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg side effects wirkt cialis bei frauen tretinoin creme kaufen ticket kaufen allianz arena avalide 150125 saw palmetto wo kaufen aciclovir 750 mg iv homöopathischer ersatz für diclofenac prilosec recall 2015 norvasc alternative brands tamoxifen 10mg vs 20mg floxin 200 mg tablet naprosyn 500 uses benadryl 10mg voltaren preisvergleich 120 citalopram alternative names inderal 40 kaufen alternative zu bupropion dulcolax dragees alternative fertomid 100mg side effects propecia preisvergleich windows explorer alternative vista l-tryptophan ratiopharm 500 mg preisvergleich torsemide 20 mg price flagyl 1000 mg atacand plus 1612 5 preis oral jelly – kamagra preis saw palmetto alternative safe alternative to lamisil herbal alternatives to antabuse propecia für frauen geeignet arava 20 mg pret nexium kaufen preis flovent 110 para que sirve la atorlip 20 mg alternative allo zovirax yasminelle generika schweiz alternative for glycomet baclofen 500 mg ticket kaufen allianz arena claritin alternative medicine alternative ciprodex rumalaya gel kaufen retin-a cream alternatives penegra express 50 side effects bentyl 20 mg uso alternative to allopurinol for gout triamterene alternatives cipro 850 mg natural alternative to sarafem arimidex 1 mg preis preis exelon preis für zovirax clomid alternative trental 400 preise Does It Matter Today How Much Giving Was Down During the Great Recession? - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Does It Matter Today How Much Giving Was Down During the Great Recession?



As a member firm of Giving Institute, the parent organization of the Giving USA Foundation and publisher of Giving USA, we are looking forward with great anticipation to the June 20th release of the annual report for 2010.

A little controversy always helps to spice up the debate. Recently, the Chronicle of Philanthropy reported that new data from the IRS shows that giving by individuals dropped approximately 10.6 percent in 2008 compared to 2007, and an additional 9-14 percent in 2009 compared to 2008, for a combined two-year decrease of approximately 20 percent.  The IRS figures are in sharp contrast to the 2.4 percent drop estimated by the Giving USA report released in June 2010.

Giving USA is a leading benchmark for nonprofits and fundraisers, and the only record of American philanthropy that spans more than 50 years. It is the only annual data report on both sources and uses of contributions and its model of estimating total giving has been remarkably accurate over time. In fact, since the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University began researching and writing the report in 2001, estimates of giving have been on average within 1.1 percent of the final IRS reported number and over the past four decades the average accuracy has been within 2 percent. As the two groups have been historically aligned, this anomaly warrants more examination.

We assembled the brain trust within our firm late last week to discuss what all of this means. Clearly, during the Great Recession, we have seen a bit of a drop off in giving, especially among mega-gifts of $25 million in more. The reports during 2010 are much more encouraging, and several $100 million and more gifts have been announced. Most donors that we interviewed in campaign studies in 2008 and 2009 indicated that their giving was holding steady or increasing as the recession ended and the economic recovery started. Most of our firm’s current and recent nonprofit clients are meeting and surpassing their annual fundraising goals, and those in major capital and expansion campaigns are making good progress.

However, the number of major campaigns that have started in our Northwest region since mid-2008 has been less than during the economic expansion of 2003-2007. The successful campaigns are ones conveying urgency and the promise of strong outcomes addressing critical issues facing our community, and the sponsoring organizations have a base of committed supporters and are able to clearly engage them in why the campaign is important today.

When we ask board members and nonprofit leaders how much they believe giving dropped off during the Great Recession years of 2008 and 2009, we typically hear that it must be 40 percent, 50 percent, maybe even more.

Perception is reality. If there is a belief that giving has decreased by a really significant amount, and that confidence is not yet restored, why would nonprofit leaders have confidence in taking bold steps to address critical missions and advance projects that can help drive the economic recovery?

Yes, giving has dropped some during the Great Recession. Is a decrease – whether it be two or 20 percent – sufficient reason to derail your plans and not be true to your mission? Donors are continuing to give, and many have a renewed appreciation for the difference they can make.






Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

Collins Team

Collins Team


Leave a Reply