keppra 250 mg preis voveran 50 tablet baclofen 20 mg get you high baclofen 20 mg tab alternative für ventolin chloroquine rezeptfrei kaufen bemo allegra preis alternative drug to detrol torsemide 100 mg vermox online kaufen eurax ersatz natural alternative to differin generika für cymbalta aricept 10 mg preis ciprofloxacin 500 dan urispas 200 alternative januvia famvir 750 precio relafen 1500 mg levothroid 50 blopress alternativen suprax 100 30 ml suspension can i take 100 mg sominex relafen 1500 mg flovent 250 diskus baclofen 500 mg lincocin 10 acts 20 ashwagandha 10 uses zantac 50 amantadine 100 mg ersatz für ciprofloxacin aldactone natural alternative alternative drug for cytotec moduretic 50 robaxin 750 vs baclofen benadryl 10mg natural alternative to meclizine keflex 750 mg dosage bupropion sr 150 alternatives to proventil inhaler viagra bei frauen schwangerschaft diclofenac zäpfchen ohne rezept cefixime 100 mg itu obat apa finax 50 l-tryptophan 220mg rhinocort aqua 50 strattera 100 mg side effects liv 52 preis claritin alternative medicine ampicillin 250 mg vial anafranil rezeptfrei kaufen augmentin 7 or 10 days actonel 500mg alternative à l'atarax fertomid tablet 100mg para que sirve la atorlip 20 mg cozaar 50 mg tablet price menosan 100ml duphalac alternative aspirin 500 mg bayer etodolac xl 500mg probolan 50 que es elocon alternatives casodex 150 mg arimidex preis schweiz celexa kaufen arjuna 10 names imitrex 50 mg tablets phexin 500 mg used for alternative baclofen preis amoxicillin 750 endep alternative erythromycin 500 dosage provera 20 mg tid dulcolax dragees alternative actonel risedronate sodium 150 mg diclofenac alternatives thuoc ofloxacin 200mg reglan kaufen alternative januvia abilify preis 98 phexin 500 mg used for lithium alternative name femara kaufen seroquel generika premarin 250 pravachol 10 arimidex 1 mg preis dulcolax ersatz propecia generika rezeptfrei amantadine 100 mg keflex 750 mg dosage Boards Are People, Too - Collins Group
Skagit Valley Hospital

Boards Are People, Too



Boards don’t give money to the nonprofit organizations they govern. Individuals who serve on boards do.

Why the distinction?

Because it creates the correct paradigm for how development professionals should be approaching their board members for philanthropic support and measuring outcomes.

If I ruled the nonprofit universe, I would ban the term “board giving” from our lexicon when it refers to the total dollar support from the board from one year to the next.

Here’s the problem: Say collective board giving jumps from $90,000 to $110,000 in a given year. Success, right? But what if that jump is attributed to a new board member stepping up with a gift of $30,000 and the remaining board members, who last year collectively gave $90,000, deciding they are now off the hook and dial it down to a collective $80,000. Would you say that your board giving is moving in the right direction?

The reality is that the “board” is not a single-brained collective moving in some sort of unified philanthropic direction. They are individuals, each differently blessed with financial assets and each grappling with life challenges, such as aging parents, financial setbacks, divorce, kids in college, just like everyone else. And, as the illustration above shows, board composition is constantly shifting. This makes a strictly dollars raised criteria not very helpful in gauging whether you are maximizing the philanthropic potential from each of your board members.

What would be better tools for measuring board giving? How about these:

  • Each board member needs to give a gift annually. This tried-and-true measurement must be a stated criteria for any person asked to join a nonprofit board in the 21st century.
  • Each board member commits to including the organization in his/her will or through another planned giving vehicle. Achieving that goal is fairly pie-in-the-sky, but it is not unrealistic to set a goal of having a personal, intentional conversation with each board member about this way of giving.
  • Each board member commits to placing the organization within the top three of all the nonprofits they support. Again, this provides a great place to have that intentional conversation with each board member about where your nonprofit ranks on her or his priority list, and what it will take to move it up the ladder.

You’ll need to develop benchmarks accordingly. Let’s say currently only 75 percent of your board members give annually; 10 percent have a planned gift in place; and 25 percent have your organization in the top three of their philanthropic priorities.

A three-year benchmark might be 100 percent annual support; 20 percent with a planned gift and 35 percent in the top three. A five-year benchmark might be 100-30-50. An every-year benchmark is to commit to having a one-on-one, personal conversation with each board member about her or his philanthropic support.

These benchmarks (tailored and scaled to the size of your nonprofit and sophistication of your development program) can be pursued and realistically attained regardless of the relative wealth of your board members and regardless of the composition of the board at any point in time. It will also maximize giving for the board you have now, not the one you had last year or five years ago.

Stop looking at your board as a single entity. Start looking at the individuals who comprise your board, and begin approaching the task of “board giving” from this perspective.

In doing so, you will get the greatest support possible from your board as a collective and move much further toward your ultimate goal – creating a strong culture of philanthropy within all levels of your organization for generations to come.


Like this post? Why not share it?


About the Author

James Plourde

James Plourde CFRE

Senior Consultant

James is always willing to ask the needed questions, helping his clients clarify their path and giving them the confidence to proceed.


Leave a Reply